Marxism

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Marxism. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Marxism paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Marxism, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Marxism paper at affordable prices !

Karl Marx made his opinions and beliefs very clear to the world. Through the Communist Manifesto, Marx makes numerous points about Marxism. He also describes his feelings about how the worker is seen and used by society. In the Communist Manifesto, Marx also speaks about what course he sees the dialectic taking. Marx made four major points in the Manifesto. Historical materialism, class struggle, dialectic, and communists were those four major points. Historical materialism described people think and act was determined by the way in which they made their living. As a result a society's economic system made up its foundation. Also, according to Marx the driving force of history was what people went after for money (the economic change). Another major point was class struggle. Marx classified the two groups that society was broken down into as the bourgeoisie (the haves) and the proletariat (the have nots). Marx believed that political power is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another. In the Manifesto Marx wrote "It […] has set up that single, unconscionable freedom- Free Trade. In one word for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation." Marx believed that the bourgeoisie made the honored careers of physicians, lawyers, etc. "into just its paid wage-laborers." The bourgeoisie couldn't exist unless it continuously improved the tools of production and everything that was related to the production. Every class struggle was actually a political struggle and the proletariat class was actually a revolutionary class. This was because the other classes would weaken and eventually fade away in modern history while the proletariat is "its special and essential product." Another of Marx's main points was the dialectic. The dialectic was Hegel's idea that all things travel on a cycle of Anti Thesis against Thesis resulting in a synthesis. What this mean sis that something is challenged by its opposite. Hegel and Marx both believed that revolution was always going and never ended. The Communists were seen by Marx as the "Vanguard of the Proletariat," meaning the proletariat alone was unable to determine what needed to be done. That had to be told and led by the people who "understood the line of march." In addition, the communists were seen as a group that was separate from the general population. "The Communists fought for the attainment of the immediate aims, for the enforcement of the momentary interests of the working class; but in the movement of the present, they also represent and take care of the future of that movement." Marx believed that the role of the worker was crucial. He felt that the worker was taken advantage of and seen as a piece of machinery. The family of the worker became the economic unit. Poor families must have had many children to make money. They had to provide social security because there was no pension. If a member of the family was hurt then the others had to keep working to bring in the money. "The class of laborers lived only so long as they could find work and who found work only so long as their labor increases capital." Those laborers had to sell themselves piecemeal (piece work) which meant the work was done one piece at a time. "There were commodities and consequently exposed to all the vicissitudes of competition." Marx wrote about how the work of the proletariats had lost all individual character. They became "appendages of the machine [….] The price of a commodity is equal to the price of production. In proportion, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases." The worker was hired to do what was needed, and as soon as that work was done so was the worker. To sum it all up, Marx felt that the worker was seen just as a piece of equipment and society cared nothing for him (the worker).

Order essays on Marxism and other topics

There are 10 steps that Marx wanted to see for a "workers' paradise". Those 10 steps were his plan for communism. Those 10 steps were to abolish private property, a heavy progressive income tax (the richer you were the more taxes you paid), to abolish all right of inheritance, the confiscation of emigrants and rebels (people who moved out of the country or rose against the government). More were to centralize credit in the hands of the state by means of a state bank which has the monopoly (the state ran bank would be the only one to give credit), the centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hand of the state, the extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, in accordance with a general plan. The last three steps were the equal liability of all to labor (everyone had to work), combination of agriculture with industry to maximize food production and the last step was free education for all children in public schools couple with abolition of children factory labor. However, those steps would not be easily done. Marx saw a specific course for the dialectic to take. "In all these movements they bring to the front, as the leading question in each case, the property question, no matter what its degree of development at the time. Finally they (the communists) labor everywhere for the union and agreement of the democratic parties of all countries." Marx declared that the unions were to unite in order to achieve those 10 steps. "They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions." What Marx meant by this was that there must be a violent revolution. According to him, the only way change would be achieved was by violence and change would not be by ballot but by bullet. In the end Marx wrote, "Workingmen of all countries, unite!" In the Communist Manifesto, Marx made four major points historical materialism, class struggle, dialectic, and communists. He also described his that the worker was just used by society and seen as a piece of machinery. Marx declared that a violent revolution must take place in order for his 10 steps of communism to be achieved. Please note that this sample paper on Marxism is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Marxism, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Marxism will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Old vs. New

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Old vs. New. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Old vs. New paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Old vs. New, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Old vs. New paper at affordable prices !

Stacy MeyerEnglish 0Old vs. New"Poetry The art of apprehending and interpreting ideas by the faculty of imagination; the art of idealizing in thought and in expression." (www.dictionary.com) Imagination, thought, expression, what exactly do these words mean? As with any poem, it may have different meanings to different individuals. "Reapers," defines these words in its own way by creating a story, using literary techniques, and sending a message. In eight short lines, this work of art paints a vivid scene for the reader to place themselves in. The way in which this author has selected his words, provides a base for the poem. To see the significance between the base and the sounds of the poem, we must first interpret it.

Write a research paper on Old vs. New

When reading Reapers, it is very helpful to forget about the lines, and concentrate on the punctuation. The poem is asking one to think about the sensory details it projects. Poems often use a means of the five sensory details, including touch, taste, smell, hear, and sight to convey messages that are hidden in the text. Poets are very selective in the words that they chose to use in their own work to make the poem appealing. The author has included many words that paint a visual picture of the poem and the atmosphere in which it takes place. "Black reapers with the sound of steel on stones are sharpening scythes." The author sets up the mood of the poem to portray death. This line gives the reader a visual image of men sharpening their tools on stones. It makes the mood feel deep and dark, using the words black reapers. It also makes the reader think of large, gray stones which are also a dark color. Reapers were field workers that harvested grain with the scythes. The tools (scythes) were sharpened on rocks and stones so they would cut the wheat in one swift sweep.

"I see them place the hones in their hip pockets as a thing that's done." This poem goes through a story. It portrays the picture of the black reapers that are finished with sharpening their tools and now placing hones in their pockets. The farmers (reapers) often wore overalls on the farm or while doing farm work, which would explain the hip pockets. Hones are a fine-grained stone in which may be used to sharpen an edge for a cutting tool. To someone that works on a farm, this would seem like "a thing that's done," because work like this can be repetitious and an everyday routine. "And start their silent swinging, one by one." Again, following the story, the author is giving a setting while telling the story. The action of the scythes is silent when it whips through the air. Especially when cutting wheat, it is a very quiet process. The author uses the word silent to think of what the reaper is doing as graceful. The reapers are swift and skilled at the task set before them. It is here that the poem switches directions. The author does not print a break in between these two lines, but there is a change in action. The break represents a major change in life. The rural time with the reapers doing manual labor with the scythes is replaced by a mower being pulled by horses. It represents a change from the use of man power and manual labor to the use of machines. Starting out very silent and rhythmically as the reapers are with their scythes, the mower changes the scene while it is moving hazardously, even killing the rat and other living things beneath the weeds. This symbolizes a change in time and technology. "Black horses drive a mower through the weeds." This line switches the scene away from the reapers and on to the black horses and mower. The horses are pulling the mower through the weeds which tells the reader that the poem was written about a time in age when motorized vehicles had not taken over the farm industry, but technology had now started using some modernized tools. Weeds also make you think that the grass is tall and there could be animals such as bugs and mice underneath the grass close to the ground. "And there, a field rat, startled, squealing bleeds." This line a keeps the story flowing. The field rat was underneath the weeds and the black horses and mower ran over it, cutting the rat with the blades of the mower. "His belly close to the ground." I see the blade, blood-stained, continue cutting weeds and shade." The belly close to the ground means that the rat was underneath the weeds and could not be seen from above. The rat is squealing in pain, bleeding from the mower. The author sees the blade, coming up from the weeds, and covered in blood from cutting open the rat. "Continue cutting weeds and shade," means that the black horses and the mower never stop as if hitting the rat did not even phase them. They just keep on moving along, completing their task. Throughout the poem the author uses many literary terms and devices, including imagery, blank verse, implied metaphor, irony of situation, setting, style, symbols, and theme. This provides a constant rhythm to the poem. Imagery is used by painting the vivid picture it does throughout the poem. It presents a situation in which the reader can identify the illustration described by the author. The author writes the poem with an iambic rhythm, which involves almost every line using ten syllables. Implied metaphor is when the mood or agent is implied, but not stated. Implied metaphor is apparent when the author always uses the word black to signify depressed mood throughout the poem. Irony of situation occurs when there is a sharp contradiction between what is logically expected to happen and what does happen. One expects that the new mower, a form of new technology would help the situation when that is not always the case. Setting is used throughout when the author describes the field, scythes and the reapers themselves. Word choice is important because of the ten syllables in each line and the sensory words including silent and squealing. Symbols are the reapers and the mower representing the manual labor and the machines. When looking at the poem from the broader perspective, one understands that the poem is contrasting the difference between manual labor and the modernization of machines. The poem highlights that technology can not always be a good thing. Although this poem was written in 1, there had already been many new inventions that changed the way Americans lived. "Reapers" clearly defines that a change in history can be described in as little as eight lines. Please note that this sample paper on Old vs. New is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Old vs. New, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Old vs. New will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Hamlet is a Misogynist

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Hamlet is a Misogynist. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Hamlet is a Misogynist paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Hamlet is a Misogynist, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Hamlet is a Misogynist paper at affordable prices !

Hamlet Is A Misogynist In William Shakespeare's renowned play, Hamlet, the title character has many different states of mind and personality changes. However, he consistently shows throughout the play evidence of misogynistic behaviour. Because Hamlet feels so betrayed by the actions of his mother, he begins to associate this betrayal with the actions of all women, which in turn causes him to treat Ophelia cruelly and unfairly. Hamlet's misogyny is shown in how he speaks to and about his mother, how he cruelly addresses Ophelia, and in how he refers to women in general. Hamlet shows many times in the play that he has a high disrespect for women, and uses his low opinion towards the female gender as a stereotype for all women. This, by definition could easily be interpreted as misogyny. Throughout the play, the leading character of Hamlet behaves in a misogynistic manner towards the women in his life. However, many things he says in passing also involve misogynistic content. Hamlet appears to have a slight obsession with women being promiscuous to the point that he includes this in his analogies. "Must, like a whore, unpack my heart with words." (Act II, sc. Ii, l.58). Even though Hamlet could have easily used another analogy in it's place, he seemed to feel the need to mention 'whores' there. In discussion with Ophelia, Hamlet mentions how he believes that women are two-faced. "God hath given you one face, and you make yourselves another." (Act III, sc. i, l.144-150). Although Hamlet believes that Ophelia is deceitful, it is the word "yourselves" that proves to be misogynistic. Hamlet is referring to the actions of all women, not just Ophelia or his mother. Hamlet also believes that all women are out only to deceive men like himself. "It is but foolery but it is such a kind of gain-giving as would perhaps trouble a woman." (Act V, sc. ii, l.06-07). He refers to 'gain-giving' as meaning a feeling of anxiety or misgiving, which he is associating with women. It is proved several times in the play that Hamlet has a high disrespect for all women that he continually mentions in casual conversation.

Ford

Online essay help on Hamlet is a Misogynist

After the death of his father, and his mother's hasty remarriage, to his uncle, Hamlet begins to show feelings of hatred and contempt towards his mother. Many of the things he says about her, or in reference to her could easily be seen as misogynistic. He refers to her actions as if they are typical of all women. In Act III, while conversing with Hamlet about the play that is being put on, and Hamlet is impatient with the introduction of the play. Ophelia assures him that it will be brief, to which Hamlet replies, "As woman's love." (Act III, sc. ii, l.108). Although Ophelia has done nothing to betray Hamlet in any way and is still very much in love with him, Hamlet assumes that her love will not be long-lasting simply because Gertrude's love for Hamlet's father did not last any length of time after his death. In a soliloquy early into the play, Hamlet mentions what he considers to be his mother's betrayal to him and his father and utters, "Frailty, thy name is woman!" (Act I, sc. ii, l.146). 'Frailty is apparently referring to his mother's 'moral weakness' which in Gertrude's case, could very well be true, but it his reference to all women having moral weaknesses and being distrustful that shows misogyny. Similarly, when Hamlet finds out the truth regarding his father's death from the Ghost, he includes the line, "O most pernicious woman!" in his soliloquy (Act I, sc. ii l.106). It is assumed that he is using the word 'pernicious' as being fatal or tragic, reiterating that he considers women to be evil and whose purpose is to destroy men. It is evident in many cases that Hamlet feels betrayed by his mother and seems to use these feelings against all women. It is evident throughout the play that Hamlet holds bitter feelings towards women as a result of the actions of his mother, Gertrude. These feelings are clearly shown by the way that he talks to Ophelia on countless occasions. Although at times he ears to be in love with her, he thinks that she is untrustworthy and deceitful. "That if you be honest and fair, your honesty should admit no discourse to your beauty." (Act III, sc. ii, l.108-10). Even though Ophelia has done nothing to betray Hamlet he constantly belittles her. Hamlet believes that Ophelia is a whore and can only be saved by religion, and does not deserve to be happy with a man. "If thou

Ford dost marry, I'll give plague for thy dowry be chaste as ice, as pure as snow, thou shalt not escape calumny. Get thee to a nunnery, go farewell, or, if thou wilt needs marry, marry a fool, for wise men know what monsters you make of them." (Act III, sc. i, l.15-140). Although Ophelia has not acted in a promiscuous manner, Hamlet believes that all women are whores because he thinks that his mother has acted like one. And although Ophelia has professed her love to Hamlet, he believes that she is being deceptive with her feelings towards him. "I could interpret between you and your love if I could see the puppets dallying." (Act III, sc. ii, l.4-4). Even though Ophelia appears to truly love Hamlet he refuses to believe that her intentions are sincere. Throughout the play, Ophelia remains to be innocent, naïve and in love with a man who constantly insults her. However, Hamlet's opinion of women has been jaded by his mother and therefore he treats Ophelia terribly and in a misogynistic manner. Hamlet proves many times in the play that he does indeed not hate just the women in his life, but apparently all women in general. Several of the misogynistic things that he says are not about the specific women that he is involved with, but about the entire female gender. It appears that his outlook on women was drastically altered by what he considers to be his mother's deception and promiscuity and therefore has taken a discriminatory and misogynistic view on women. Please note that this sample paper on Hamlet is a Misogynist is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Hamlet is a Misogynist, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Hamlet is a Misogynist will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Gifts of the jews

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on gifts of the jews. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality gifts of the jews paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in gifts of the jews, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your gifts of the jews paper at affordable prices !

BOOK REVIEW Thomas Cayhill's The Gift Of the Jews Chapter 1

The book begins by commenting on the written word, which was carved in Sumer of Uruk, the world's first civilization and perhaps earliest city. It is stated that this writing "invention" came out of necessity to be able to keep and reference accounts and transactions. Thus, written symbols took the place of human memory. When reading further into this chapter and getting some insight into the Sumerian people, I can now somewhat understand their desire to improve recording methods and account summaries. Cayhill praises the Sumerians by describing their relatively "sophisticated" lifestyle. They were advanced in the areas of farming, mathematics, husbandry, and medicine, as well as possessing many other skills and talents. Overall, the Sumerians are described as practical and down-to-earth businesspeople. This chapter brings up an interesting and ironical point that although the Sumerians, "the black-headed people" invented writing, the instrument that makes history possible, they themselves had no sense of history. Partly because of this, Sumerian stories and tales miss the sense of development that has become the norm in all modern works. Cayhill relates their story-telling techniques to a young child repeating a joke they heard, yet the punch-line is of no importance to them and usually there isn't one. Aside from their lousy literary structure, Cayhill says that we today enjoy these stories because we can associate some of our emotions with theirs, and therefore feel closer to them. A solid portion of the chapter is dedicated to summarizing a Sumerian work that has perhaps impacted our culture more than any of their other literatures. The story is called the Epic of Gilgamesh, a legend of a hero called Gilgamesh, the king of Uruk during the third millennium B.C. This story begins with a piece of poetry that describes and glamorizes the city of Uruk. The story includes themes of loneliness, friendship, love, teamwork, lust, and other important topics that surround our culture today. Towards the end, Gilgamesh loses his dear friend Enkidu and, after seven days of grieving, he sets out to obtain the secret of immortality. The epic concludes when Gilgamesh finally finds the only mortal man who has been granted immortality (Ut-napishtim, who is the model for the biblical Noah) who offers him some advice that Cayhill believes to be the main lesson of this work. In short, Gilgamesh is told that no matter how hard he tries, he will not be able to avoid or escape death. He is advised by the alewife to enjoy life while he is still alive, to appreciate the things he has and those around him. The chapter concludes with Cayhill describing similarities and differences between Sumerian qualities and those of our society today. He also says that portions of the Hebrew Bible have evolved from Sumerian times, emphasizing the tail of the primordial flood and the ark that preserved life.

Chapter Chapter two begins by mentioning a topic that was discussed briefly during one of our lectures, which involves the idea that so many of the major aspects of our world move in a circular fashion. Namely, primitive humans looked to heaven and saw what Cayhill calls the "wheel of life," which revolved around the "hub of death." Cayhill mentions that a work was recently found in Australia that is perhaps the earliest human art, about 75,000 years old. This piece consists of a series of circles which in Cayhill's mind, acknowledges the patter of the "ever-turning wheel." Animals are mentioned which were thought to be earth animals manifested by the moon, or, "moon-creatures." These include a snake, spider, bull, oyster with its pearl, snail, and a bear. Cayhill explains that however illogical it may seem to us, these theories produced by primitive man are the same as our attempts to fine some truth out there. Cayhill then goes into the "begettings" of Terah, who are made up by Avram (Abraham), Nahor and Haran. He then goes into the journey of Terah, Avram, Lot and Sarai. They left from Ur of the Chaldeans, and set out for Canaan. However, they settled in the land of Harran, where Terah died. The question is brought up as to whether or not these citizens of Ur planned to settle in Harran instead of Canaan. The justification for such an argument lies in the fact that Terah and his family were well established int eh land of Ur. Why would they want to leave that for Canaan, a land where the people ate their meat raw and did not know how to bury their dead. Regardless of the intent, Cayhill moves on to include the excerpt of a voice coming to Avram, which probably took place in Harran. After being blessed and promised a great nation, Avram, along with Sarai and Lot, set out for Canaan. Cayhill brings up a point that no matter how far away they travel from their original home, their Sumerian heritage went with. Cayhill then relates this to an insight that everyone can take away from this. Avram, Sarai and Lot "could no more escape this mind-set of their culture any more than we can escape ours. The lesson, in my eyes, is that things do not change overnight. One cannot leave a place and expect to rid himself/herself of all that he wants to leave behind. This perspective of the Sumerian includes, as mentioned earlier, the emphasis on and importance of business. Another viewpoint, stated well by Ut-napishtim and other Sumerian proverbs, revolves around the selfishness and impurity of man. "Man behaves badly," and "Never has a sinless child been born." After the death of Terah, the remaining three set out on their journey. Avram is described as a childless man who is sent by his god to make his "great nation," although he does not know where he's headed. Cayhill then depicts him as the chosen leader who must emerge from the people, who know that everything ends in death, and teach them to dream of something new in the future. It is mentioned that virtually every population of peoples would have scorned Avram's attempts and shook their heads in disbelief.Chapter In the beginning of chapter three, Cahill does his best to encapsulate the power of God. All dialogue between God and human is initiated by God. "This God" is not the main character of a myth, nor is he a typical "ancient divinity" or "achetypal gesturer." Rather, he is an actual personality who has, by changing the course of life as humans know it, made life and everything that surrounds it, unpredictable. Please note that this sample paper on gifts of the jews is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on gifts of the jews, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on gifts of the jews will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Welfare

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Welfare. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Welfare paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Welfare, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Welfare paper at affordable prices !

Economic Programs That Maintain IncomeWelfare was a program first established to help provide food and other necessary items to struggling families. Welfare is a government program that provides money, medical care, food, housing, and other things that people need in order to survive. Although the program was not intended to last forever, it has lasted for decades. Welfare takes a portion of everyone's money, whether a person is poor or rich, and then distributes it to families or individuals in need. The welfare program affects all taxpayers. Welfare programs aim at helping people who are unable to support themselves fully or earn a living. Welfare recipients include elderly people, people with mental or physical disabilities, and those needing help to support dependent children. People in the United States most commonly use the term welfare to refer to government-funded programs that provide economic support, goods, and services to unemployed or underemployed people or it can be considered to be public assistance. Although many people see welfare as a burden, welfare benefits are, indeed, a necessary government program.To be sure, welfare does have downfalls that affect society. The criticism of welfare ranges over a number of social and economic issues (National 1). Some people criticize welfare programs for not providing high enough benefits to eliminate poverty (National 1). Spending on welfare would have to increase greatly to eliminate poverty, and many people believe the cost is already too high. Many critics of the welfare system state that providing a steady income to needy people encourages idleness (National 1). People on welfare should not be stereotyped as "lazy freeloaders." Many welfare recipients are parents who just can't get ahead. In addition, some children are the victims of teasing because they are receiving welfare. Also, welfare promotes too much independence, which can cause some of the people to always depend on the support of society. Some parents can work, but they can also be lazy and if they can get on welfare, then they will try to stay on it. They refuse to take their share of responsibility and believe that welfare must help them. Welfare also sets bad examples for children. Some welfare recipients depend too much and take advantage of welfare. In contrast, other people such as disabled individuals, elders, and single parent deserves to receive some government assistance. However, they do not get as much as they need because the government provides welfare to both deserving and undeserving people. This will create an imbalance between recipients. Those who really need welfare cannot get enough, while others receive more than what they need. Therefore, the government should provide welfare to deserving people who really need assistance and jobs to those who are able to work.Although welfare does have pitfalls, it does benefit society by helping the disabled and supporting them. Disabled people with a low income rely on Disabilities Living Allowance to be able to afford the basic living expense (Division 1). Welfare provides stability to a family. Welfare also gives a family a portion of money a month to assist with financial needs. Welfare gives hope to families who do not have any by allowing them a chance to get ahead. A family knowing that they are going to receive assistance when they need it tends to boost morale, thus helping an individual to keep working their way out of poverty.

Purchase your paper on Welfare

In addition, welfare supports the elderly and it provides assistance to the needy. Welfare offers retirement plans for those in old age and it grants them a check every month to support themselves (Weinberger 18). Without welfare, the senior citizens would have to work for a longer period of time and would not benefit from all the years they have put into their jobs. Welfare also helps the elderly by providing them with a sense of independence. Welfare provides Medicare to senior citizens to assist them with hospital and medical insurance benefits (Machan 10). Also, welfare enables the state to receive federal funds for medical care to aged persons whose income and resources are not sufficient to pay medical expenses, but who are not able to meet the provisions on Old-Age Assistance. Welfare offers financial support to the medical expenses that comes from hospitals. Although welfare provides help with the needy and the old age, it also helps the single mothers who cannot afford a child. As a general rule, men in this society do not feel as responsible for child welfare as women. When a child is sick, it is usually the mother that stays home from work. Welfare helps provide money to mothers on a low income and it also help prevent poverty. Welfare helps give mothers an income to provide for their family. Welfare also gives children free lunches at school, when they cannot afford it (Weinberger 15). Welfare provides a child with a daily meal at school so they can maintain a good self-esteem. Welfare also provides single mother with food stamps (Weinberger 0). A single mother with food stamps can provide food for her family even if she is experiencing financial troubles (Garfinkel ). Welfare also provides rent for the low-income mothers who cannot afford rent (Weinberger 1). Welfare offers a single mother the assistance she needs in providing a place to live for her and her child. So therefore, welfare does help accomplish necessities for people who need it the most. In conclusion, welfare provides many benefits to individuals who qualify for it. It offers individuals a lot of support that they cannot find anywhere else. The welfare system is an important aspect of American society. It assists the impoverished individuals and families of our nation. It helps support the unemployed during their time of need. Welfare offers individuals a lot of support that they do not have in life. Welfare is a government program that can benefit people. Welfare can serve as an excellent source to help prevent and improve homelessness and poverty in society.Works CitedDivision of Public Assistance. 16, November 00. http//health.hss.state.us/dpa/programs/atap.htmlGarfinkel, Irwin. "Welfare," World Book Online Americas Edition, 15, November 00. http//www.aolsvc.worldbook.aol.comMachan, Tibor. "Private rights and public illusions." New Brunswick, N.J., U.S.A. c15.National Governors Association. 15, November 00. http//www.nga.org/lobbyIssues/1,116,D_151,00.html Weinberger, Paul. "Perspectives on Social Welfare." New York, New York, Macmillan Publishing Co. c174 Please note that this sample paper on Welfare is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Welfare, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Welfare will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!