The Relationship between Pip ad Joe

If you order your cheap essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Relationship between Pip ad Joe. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Relationship between Pip ad Joe paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Relationship between Pip ad Joe, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Relationship between Pip ad Joe paper at affordable prices !

In the timeless novel, Great Expectations by Charles Dickens, Pip, the protagonist, and his brother-in-law, Joe Gargery, have a relationship like no other. This developing kinship proves itself to be one of mutual friends in the commencement, but as the novel prolongs, Pip thinks of himself as superior to Joe and becomes condescending towards him. In the conclusion of the novel, one may come to understand that the relationship between Joe and Pip is easily compared to a circle. By the end of the novel Pip and Joe's relationship has clearly made a 60° rotation and Pip and Joe are acquaintances once again. The novel begins with Pip and Joe as equals. Pip even admired Joe. He exemplifies his admiration for Joe after he and Joe had shared an emotional night together. Joe had explained to Pip about his alcoholic father and how he felt about Mrs. Joe Gargery, Pip's sadistic sister. He also tells Pip about how it was he that induced Mrs. Joe to bring Pip into their household after Pip's parents had died. Pip reflects on this moment and exclaims, "Young as I was, I believe I dated a new admiration of Joe from that night. We were equals afterwards, as we had been before; but, afterwards at quiet times when I sat looking at Joe and thinking about him, I had a new sensation of feeling conscious that I was looking up to Joe in my heart. (Ch.7 Pg. )" At that particular moment, Joe's status as a blacksmith did not matter to Pip. Pip admired Joe for the benevolent person that he was. Pip and Joe's relationship was like one of any two best friends. They were equals, but there was always that admiration for the other who possessed that special quality. Pip sparked the first change in his relationship with Joe steadily as he became more and more haughty. At one point in the romance, after Pip had come into "great fortune", Pip was so ashamed of Joe, that he didn't even want to walk with him on the morning of his departure, where he was to go to London and become a gentlemen. Pip recollects, "…that this purpose originated in my sense of the contrast there would be between me and Joe, if we went to the coach together. (Ch.1 Pg. )" Pip didn't want anybody to see that he had come from a "common" condition. Moving onto London, Pip did not want to be associated with a blacksmith and he thought that there was a significant difference between him and Joe. Opening the second half of the novel, Pip continues his condescension towards Joe. Upon his sister's death, Pip acts remorseful towards Joe, who has just lost his wife. To Joe's face, Pip shows compassion and promises that he will visit Joe often, all-the-while, knowing that he will not be back . "…I should not come back…(Ch.5 Pg. )", Pip confessed to himself as he left his hometown. One can conclude that at this time Pip still thinks that he is better than Joe and does not belong in the same small town as he. Pip obviously has come to believe that one's surroundings is a definition of one's true self. He believes that a gentlemen, like himself, and a blacksmith, like Joe, do not belong together and that he is a better man that Joe is or can ever be. The relationship between Joe and Pip is like the relationship between Donna and Marie, two sisters. Donna, who is four years older than Marie is much like Pip in the sense that she thinks she is better than Marie and doesn't like to hang out with her little sister. Marie, in comparison to Joe, still loves her older sister regardless. Pip lightens his relationship with Joe, after being awfully ill. Joe takes care of Pip during this horrid period and when Pip comes to his senses he is finally thankful for Joe's fellowship. Pip repeatedly compares himself at that moment to the way he was when he was a child. "…I was like a child in his hands…(Ch.57 Pg. )", Pip thinks back on a moment when Joe was tending to him. When Pip was a child him and Joe were best friends and were equally loyal to each other. The comparison that Pip continuously makes between their relationship years ago to that moment represent that the circle of friendship between the two was now completed. The developing friendship between Joe and Pip, proved itself to be very original. The two went through many things together and in the end they made it. Joe and Pip were the best of friends in the beginning of the novel, and though Pip's change in attitude pulled them apart throughout the story, they were friends in the end of the novel.

Essay help on The Relationship between Pip ad Joe

Please note that this sample paper on The Relationship between Pip ad Joe is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Relationship between Pip ad Joe, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom research papers on The Relationship between Pip ad Joe will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

An Argument for Representative Democracy

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on An Argument for Representative Democracy. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality An Argument for Representative Democracy paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in An Argument for Representative Democracy, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your An Argument for Representative Democracy paper at affordable prices !

A conversion of our governmental system to an Athenian model would be not only foolish but potentially dangerous to the future of our country as well. It has been suggested that the representative form of government was chosen because of the logistical problems of counting votes in an era with no computers or FedEx. However, in doing research and listening to the biographies of several men present at the Philadelphia convention, it seems clear that the decision was reached with great thought and wisdom.One advantage of electing an individual to represent a large group of people (and hence several socio-economic groups) is that the representative is beholden to the entire body. Because the representative depends upon the approval of a majority for his continuation in office it is difficult for him/her to favor one faction to the detriment of the others without risk of losing his position. In this way equilibrium is attained in which no group completely dominates another and no minority voice is unheard. It is a credit to the wisdom of the founders that they were able to devise a system which not only accounts for the selfish nature of a man but uses that ambition to its favor!In contrast, within a democracy the individual owes allegiance only to his own self-interests and beliefs. While many of us purport ourselves to be persons of integrity and fully aware of our civic responsibilities, we seldom hold such lofty opinions of our neighbors. In a country where the poor and middle-class far outnumber the wealthy who would protect the rights of the upper-class? Who would protect the rights of Jews and Muslims to worship in their Synagogues and Mosques? At a time when factions change with the tides, how can the rights of any minority be protected from the whim of the majority? It is interesting to note that we are all, in some way, a minority - it just depends on how you slice the pie. In 188 James Fenimore Cooper wrote, "It is a besetting vice of democracies to substitute public opinion for law. This is the usual form in which masses of men exhibit their tyranny." This seems eerily akin to the "...tyranny of the masses" which Greek philosophers warned of over 000 years earlier. It is similarly disquieting to realize that none of the democracies of ancient times still exists.Let us suspend distrust in the motives of our fellow man and suppose for the moment that we will all act (read vote) in the best interests of the whole of society. Even were this improbable suspension of belief possible, pure democracy would still face formidable challenges, chief among these being a massive amount of legislation. A cursory review of the 107th Congress web site reveals a mind-numbing workload of Resolutions, 8 Concurrent Resolutions, 81 Joint Resolutions, 610 Bills, and 414 Amendments facing the House of Representatives alone!

Professional writers help on An Argument for Representative Democracy essays

In our current system we elect representatives with the expectation that they will acquire a fundamental understanding of the issues facing the nation and so be able to make informed legislative decisions. The only way they are able to perform their duty is by working full-time and hiring a staff to assist them in understanding and responding to the issues. In contrast, a direct democracy would require that each voter obtain a similar level of understanding so that he/she could likewise make prudent choices. Reality tells us that few citizens have the benefit of a staff and even fewer the means to contemplate politics on a full-time basis. Finally, the issue, which was pushed to the fore of the American conscious on Sept. 11, 001 national security. In a "true" democracy, national security would be virtually impossible to enforce. How would the citizenry be able to engage in honest debate over issues involving, for example, intelligence operations or defense capabilities without endangering the very mechanisms put in place to protect them? Representative systems minimize this liability by limiting the number of people involved in discussions of such sensitive topics. The result is a much higher level of accountability and security as the source of a breach is easier to discover.Legislative overload, national security, and the power-grabbing nature of man are all good reasons to continue with the form of government the founding fathers laid out for us. The failed democracies of ancient Greece and Rome provided compelling evidence of what the future holds for a true democracy. As John Adams said, "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." Please note that this sample paper on An Argument for Representative Democracy is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on An Argument for Representative Democracy, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on An Argument for Representative Democracy will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Descartes (not essay just thoughts while helping a friend)

If you order your essay from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on descartes (not essay just thoughts while helping a friend). What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality descartes (not essay just thoughts while helping a friend) paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in descartes (not essay just thoughts while helping a friend), therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your descartes (not essay just thoughts while helping a friend) paper at affordable prices !

Dave ...please comment on the following journalquestion....)Descartes thinks that he has discovered something thatcannot be doubted ( even thought this came after an

Online essay help on descartes (not essay just thoughts while helping a friend)

attempt to doubt everything possible). Say what it isthat Descartes thinks we cannot doubt, and explain inyour own words why he thinks we cannot doubt it. Whatmight we take from this on a more personal (that is ona less philosophical and abstract) level? How mightthis influence our real lives?Descarte lived in the time of Galileo, and Galileosnew science is always in the background of Descartesmethod of doubt.(remember that , method of doubt)Galileo raised the doubt that what we think we see wemight not see at all. (for example)colors seemed to bemore in the minds of men and women than in the objectsthemselves. and if we can be mistaken about somethingso seemingly clear as the color of an object,Descartes reasons could we not be mistaken about muchelse besides?this is where he decides to follow his method of doubtto its conclusion, and find at least one thing hecannot doubt. since experience gained from ones senses can bedoubted, he chooses to use the REASONING OF HIS MINDas his only guide and also as his proof.(you wouldhave to read the paper to find out how he comes todoubt everything and his reasonings behind it) but the one thing he cannot doubt at all is his ownexistence now, he is not talking about the physicalbody, for he has doubt that any corporeal (made outof matter) thing really exists. no being,no object,nosubstance,no beam of light, nor speck of dust iswithout a doubt of being real.so his conclusion from meditation is so after having reflected well and carefully examinedall things, we must come to the definite conclusionthat this proposition I AM, I EXIST, is necessarilytrue each time that i pronounce it, or mentallyconceive it. the more famous formulation of this truth (fromdiscourse on method 167) is COG ITO,ERGO,SUM. which is Latin for I THINKTHEREFORE I AMto try to explain this in my own words can get tricky.even when Descartes tries to re-state it, it seemslike double talk. but i will try.if you look at your own hand and think you see it andconsider that as proof that you do in fact have ahand, you are not taking into account the possibilitythat you are dreaming of looking at your hand.youcould just be asleep.and if you are just dreaming thenyou really dont know for sure if you have a hand.and what if you project that not just to this oneinstance of looking at your hand, but instead ontoyour life as a whole? maybe your childhood was a very long chronologicaldream of what YOU SUPPOSED a childhood should be. and (god Im starting to freak out) it follows thatany person you know is just a figment of yourimagination. if you (Paula) are in fact the one thatis dreaming then (Dave) does not exist. he is just apart of your consciousness that you give certainattributes and henceforth recognize as (daveness)so if you project this towards everybody andeverything, you must admit that the only thing thatCANNOT be an illusion is the fact THAT YOU AREDREAMING. and since you cant deny that, that must atthe very least be real. Descartes goes on to try to describe himself with thisnewfound truth. since he has stated I think thereforeI am, he asks what or who am I. his answer to this is I am a thing which thinks orto use it in our analogy I am a thing which dreams (now just to calm myself down and maybe you too) thisdoes not remove the possibility that MOST of what youthink is real, is in fact real, but you just cant be100% sure. on a less philosophical level i remember Dr. Phil(yeah i said it) asking one person about an argumentand then asking the other, and he brought notice tohow each of them had a very different story about;what the argument was about, who started the argument,what was said during the argument, and so on.this does not go to show proof of I THINK THEREFORE IAM but more to how easily a person can trickthemselves into believing something that did nothappen.these two people (this is kind of a stretch) couldapply Descartes method of doubtto try to get down to the core facts of a situation orthe core issues they are disagreeing about.this might help toohttp//www.utm.edu/research/iep/d/descarte.htmok i know this is prolly way more than you asked forbut remember...you asked for it! Please note that this sample paper on descartes (not essay just thoughts while helping a friend) is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on descartes (not essay just thoughts while helping a friend), we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on descartes (not essay just thoughts while helping a friend) will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

People in America

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on People in America. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality People in America paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in People in America, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your People in America paper at affordable prices with !Born in 1 to Jewsih immigrant parents in the South African mining town of Springs,

Nadine Gordimer began writing early, from the beginning taking the pathologies and

everyday realities of a radically divided society as her subject. She still lives in South

Africa, in Johannesburg. Her decision to remain in the country through the years of

political repression has reflected her commitment to her subject, to the society to which

she feels she belongs, and to her vision of a postapartheid future. Gordimer has drawn

criticism both for her apparent lack of attention to feminism in favor of race issues and

for the wholeness and unfashionable completeness of her novels--their plottedness,

meticulous scene painting, fully realized characters. However, the searching symbolism

and complexity of her narratives generally work against such judgments. A prominent

feature of her writing is to give a number of different perspectives on a situation, in some

cases most poignantly those of apartheids supporters, and in this way to represent the

broader anatomy of a diseased potitics. Gordimers subject, as she emphasozes, is much

more than apartheid; it is the human being in history.

In the story Good Climate, Freindly Inhabitants, the narrator plays many important roles

in the story. The narrator is 4 trying to look 5. Her hair has had too much of bleach and permanents, and her face shows her age. However, she prides herself on her figure, and she wears uniforms made for girls, not women. Thus, she fools herself, rather than anyone else. This best describes the narrators apperance. When the narrator boasts of friends among garage customers and those who pass with their dogs, she is revealing her loneliness. Actually, she has only one friend, with whom she goes to the movies on Fridays. She has Sunday lunch whenever she chooses with an old couple who feel sorry for her. It is ironic that she cannot value Jack, whom she should consider a good friend, because of his race.

The narrators relationship with her daughter increases her social isolation. She disapproved of her daughters marriage, implies that she disapproves of her grandchildren, and has seen the family only once in what could certainly be ten years. The narrator views blacks as children, and calls them "boys" no matter what their ages. When she wants to assert her superiority, she sends them on personal errands. As much as she longs for a friend, she could never consider relating to a black in that way. She complains that she works in absolute social isolation, and when Jack befriends her, she cannot recognize his friendship.

The narrator is drawn to the rhodesians physical appearance because he is young, blond, suntanned, and clean-cut. His appeals for her financial aid encourage her to reach out to him. Given her loneliness, she needs whatever relationship he offers her, and she does her best to interpret his behavior as that of a person having a run of bad luck. The reason the narrator and the Rhodesian have no names is becasue with a first-person narration, either the narrator would have to reveal her own name or someone else would have to call her by her name. Jack cannot call her by her name because his lower social status prohibits it. (Jack calls her "missus" occasionally, but usually nothing.) The Rhodesian has no interest in the narrators name. He never reveals his name, and the term "Rhodesian" associates him with the spurious circumstances of his arrival.

Other Scholors have said that Gordimer creates immediacy and power by letting the reader enter the narrators mind and view the world as the narrator sees it , with her prejudices and her vulnerablity. The narrators spoken and unspoken thoughts ironically conflict with the reality of the outer world as revealed by Jacks and Rhodesians words and deeds. Specific examples include Narrtors and Rhodesians contrasting attitudes toward her age; Narrators comments about friends in contrast with her relationship with Jack; and the Narrators view of the Rhodesian in contrast with his treatmeant with her.

"GoodClimate, friendly Inhabitants" is the defty told story of an aging white bookkeeper. Who is afraid of dying a lonely death. The story derives its power from this womans relationshipwith two men. Out of the depths of her loneliness and against her better judgement, she finds herslef attracted to a good-looking, neer-do-well white male, young enough to be her son, who conveniently lives off her as long as he can. Meanwhile, she confides in Jack, a black man who has worked with her at the garage for years. Jack is a good friend to her listening, advising, caring, and protecting. However, tragically, she cannot breach the color barrier to value and take comfort in his friendship.

Gordimer tells the story from the womans point of view, seeing and evaluating the two males and the woman herslef through the womans eyes. The technique of first-person limited narration adds irony, mystery, and the question of the reliability to the story, for the woman often presents herself and others as she subconsciously chooses to see them.

Please note that this sample paper on People in America is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on People in America, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on People in America will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

How can you change the strength of an Electromagnet?

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on How can you change the strength of an Electromagnet?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality How can you change the strength of an Electromagnet? paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in How can you change the strength of an Electromagnet?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your How can you change the strength of an Electromagnet? paper at affordable prices !

I am going to do an experiment to measure how the number of coils of insulated wire around the iron core effects the amount of paper clips attracted to the electromagnet.These are the things that could affect my results - weight of the paper clip, number of coils, shape of the core and the material it is made out of, the size and age of paper clip and how old the nail is. If I didn't keep these variables in mind they could affect the pick up number and therefore not made the results fair.For this experiment I will use a clamp, a nail, an ammeter, a power pack, four wires and some paperclips. Firstly I will set up the apparatus (mentioned above) as shown in the diagram below. I will then increase the number of coils on the nail each time by five and see if this makes a difference as to how many paper clips the nail will pick up.

Essay writing services for How can you change the strength of an Electromagnet? papers

In my experiment I will measure the number of paper clips picked up by the nail and the current (number of amps) the ammeter is on. To check and improve my results I will repeat my experiment.The biggest problem with using this method is that it is not particularly accurate and it can be very hard to attach the paper clips once you have reached a certain lengthTo keep this experiment safe I have to address the possible hazards and minimize them. The coil could heat and burn the plastic insulation so I will only use it for a couple of seconds before I turn it off. I will also use no stronger than 5 amps for the same reason. I will also make sure that there is no bare insulation or any water near any electrical equipment. This will help to prevent electrocution.I am only going to change the number of coils in my experiment. This will help to keep it a fair test. I will also have to keep the current the same throughout and use the same paper clips in each experiment. I will also always use the same iron core and try to keep the coil equally spaced out. My prediction is that when more coils are added, the strength of the magnet will increase therefore it will be able to attract more paper clips. I believe this will happen because as more coils are wrapped around the core, the magnetic field will get stronger and stronger. When we have seen a link between the number of paperclips picked up and the number of coils then we will know that we have enough results. ResultsNo. of coils No. of paper clips 1st Go nd Go Current (amps)15

1.00 4 1.5 4 4 1.40 5 5 1.45 6 6 1.4AnalysisMy results showed that the more coils around the electro magnet then the more paperclips the magnet can pick up. This proves that my prediction was correct. We also used another set of results ranging from 10 to 00 coils. Here is the results tableNumber of turns Current (A) No. Of clips held10 .0 00 .0 00 .0 150 .0 70 .0 8100 .0 110 .0 14150 .0 1700 .0 As well as my results table, my graph also shows the relationship between the number of coils and the number of paperclips picked up. You can see a curve in the graph, as from 0-10 coils the electromagnet is not able to pick up any paperclips.The first few points on the graph are low numbers; 0,0,1,. This means that the beginning of the graph is not that steep. However after the fourth point the gradients gets steeper as the number of paperclips picked up goes from up to 8, a difference of 5 paperclips. After this the gradient continues to increase until it reaches its highest known result of paper clips.In the results of the experiment I did there is what I considered to be an odd result. Instead of holding paperclips the magnet held 4 on the second attempt. This was at 0 coils. If we did the experiment for longer then the results would most likely stay the same, as the number of clips held depends on the number of coils, therefore if you continue to increase the number of coils then the number of paperclips will continue to increase. In between my points there are gaps where I will guess how many paper clips have been picked up. For instance at 40 coils, I would guess that the number of paperclips picked up was . This is because at 0 there was 1 paper clip and at 50 there were . I would also guess that at 60 coils the number of paperclips would be about or . At 110 coils I would guess that 1 paperclips would have been picked up. The graph showing my results and the graph showing the results above are quite similar. They both go up fairly steeply and at about the same rate. Lauren Oswell Please note that this sample paper on How can you change the strength of an Electromagnet? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on How can you change the strength of an Electromagnet?, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on How can you change the strength of an Electromagnet? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!